First paper for the day would be Pengajian Am. This term would be quite hectic as we have to write 3 essays in a mere 2 hours, and within the given time we are also required to complete 15 objective answers, so time's really precious
The objective questions were....odd. Questions asked were completely new and simply bizarre, but it was fine. The data synthesis was fine. The second data on inflation rate baffled everyone (science stream) who saw it, but it appears that econs students have no difficulties answering it. Perhaps Ekonomi gave them an advantage.
The essays were the tricky one. All three questions were vague-sounding, and ended with only a word bincangkan. This type of questions were what everyone dreaded and feared because you can't tell for sure what the question wants. The worst thing is Pengajian Am has one of the worst marking scheme in Malaysian education, so answering this kind of question is a huge risk. And we were forced to take the risk.
Fine, I answered two of them. Won't be expecting good result
Afternoon paper was Mathematics (T). The questions were rather straightforward and easy, so I wouldn't make a huge fuss about it. Chi-squared test on contingency table were expected, but the Pearson coefficient of skewness was way out of expectation as it was way too easy. But the bright side: everyone gets good score.
No comments:
Post a Comment